The Influence of Situational Factors in Sacrificial Dilemmas on Utilitarian Moral Judgments

نویسندگان

چکیده

Abstract The standard way to test alternative descriptive theories of moral judgment is by asking subjects evaluate (amongst others) sacrificial dilemmas, where acting classifies as a utilitarian and not deontological judgment. Previous research uncovered many situational factors that alter subject’s judgments without affecting which type action utilitarianism or deontology would recommend. This literature review provides systematic analysis the experimental on influence in dilemmas. It analyses 53 articles detail reports mean effect sizes, well operationalizations, for 36 significantly Moreover, discusses how impact relates dual process theory supports view are driven controlled cognitive processes shows drivers depend valence.

برای دانلود باید عضویت طلایی داشته باشید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

‘Utilitarian’ judgments in sacrificial moral dilemmas do not reflect impartial concern for the greater good

A growing body of research has focused on so-called 'utilitarian' judgments in moral dilemmas in which participants have to choose whether to sacrifice one person in order to save the lives of a greater number. However, the relation between such 'utilitarian' judgments and genuine utilitarian impartial concern for the greater good remains unclear. Across four studies, we investigated the relati...

متن کامل

Sidetracked by trolleys: Why sacrificial moral dilemmas tell us little (or nothing) about utilitarian judgment

Research into moral decision-making has been dominated by sacrificial dilemmas where, in order to save several lives, it is necessary to sacrifice the life of another person. It is widely assumed that these dilemmas draw a sharp contrast between utilitarian and deontological approaches to morality, and thereby enable us to study the psychological and neural basis of utilitarian judgment. Howeve...

متن کامل

Moral judgments, emotions and the utilitarian brain.

The investigation of the neural and cognitive mechanisms underlying the moral mind is of paramount importance for understanding complex human behaviors, from altruism to antisocial acts. A new study on patients with prefrontal damage provides key insights on the neurobiology of moral judgment and raises new questions on the mechanisms by which reason and emotion contribute to moral cognition.

متن کامل

Moral dilemmas in females: children are more utilitarian than adults

Influential theories on moral judgments propose that they rely either on emotions or on innate moral principles. In contrast, the mental model theory postulates that moral judgments rely on reasoning, either intuition or deliberation. The theory allows for the possibility that intuitions lead to utilitarian judgments. This paper reports two experiments involving fifth-grade children, adolescent...

متن کامل

the influence of the neo-platonic concept of poetic imagination on wordsworth’s poetry

بر اساس نظریه افلاطون در باره شعر خلاقیت هنری مورد انتقاد قرار گرفته است. نظریه کلی در مورد شعر این بود که شعر از ظواهرتقلید میکند و نه حقیقت. چون سایه ای از حقیقت است. اما با پیدایش فلسفه نو افلاطونی، انتقاتات قبلی در مورد شعر و شاعری اصلاح شد. فلوطین در کتاب انئید، اساس خلق هنری را بر محور مُثل افلاطونی قرار داد. وی باور داشت که هنر مندان در خلق آثار هنری، تحت تاثیر مُثل افلاطونی بوده و عوالمی ...

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

ژورنال

عنوان ژورنال: Review of Philosophy and Psychology

سال: 2021

ISSN: ['1878-5158', '1878-5166']

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13164-021-00547-4